"Terrorism has once again shown it is prepared deliberately to stop at nothing in creating human victims. An end must be put to this."

Vladimir Putin


Saturday, January 9, 2016

I have changed my mind.

I know I have been vehemently opposed to bringing Moslem immigrants into this country. But as it seems Barrack Hussein is going to do that no matter how stupid and dangerous it is, I think we should propose a compromise. Instead of dumping them on states like Georgia, and trying to use them to dilute red state voters with these "sure to be " democratic voters, let's just settle them all in once place.  I am thinking the NW corner of Wyoming.  So beautiful, full of natural wonders....


26 comments:

  1. Why not, they're eventually gonna burn anyway!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And the further from Georgia, the better.

      Delete
  2. Why spoil Wyoming?, There is always GITMO !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or we could set them all up with nice beachside villa's in the Pacific Northwest. I hear that the Cascadia subduction zone sometimes creates beautiful scenic waves out there.

      Delete
    2. rob,
      because if this worked out to become true gitmo would be stuffed to the gills with politicians.

      Delete
    3. I heard on the news today that 30 percent of the individuals released from Gitmo have gone right back to terrorist organizations and are participating in Anti-Western activities. One of them seems to have been involved in planning the Paris debacle. But Barrack says he is going to let the last (and worst) thirty out before the end of his term, because he "promised" to shut down Gitmo, and he apparently doesn't give a damn what havoc those thirty cause if he gets his way. What a contemptible egotist and poltroon that guy has turned out to be.

      Delete
  3. Here is solution to most our problems. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-governor-calls-for-constitutional-convention/ar-CCiIFz?ocid=HPCDHP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me take a look at that. Sounds interesting from the URL.

      Delete
  4. Hey Wirecutter,

    (captaincrunch)

    Good Idea.

    One question, with the musloids why are they so angry?

    'Pump there their goats up with Xanex and observe the muslims for any behavioral changes after eating and milking the goats.
    Happy people don't commit homicide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you limited to eating and milking the goats. For a second I thought we were going to a dark place... ;-)

      Delete
  5. And surround them with a 100' tall wall.

    For their own safety, of course.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. That's my top priority. Keeping them safe from evil people who don't want them infesting the whole country.

      Delete
  6. We live in that kill zone, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there's that. But be sure you have "Flashman" spelled right in your will! It's an ill wind......

      Delete
  7. Hi there .
    I like your plan. We are in England and are being overrun
    with the same cultural enrichers but have no volcano to solve
    the problem .The only fly in the ointment I can see is that
    they may get a warning and evacuate. By the way, love the blog
    all the best to you
    from
    the Carmichaels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Welcome aboard. Don't feel badly. Your politicians and our politicians are completely in sync on how wonderful things will be once we all speak Arabic and wear little towels wrapped around our heads. ;-)

      Delete
  8. Thanks, but, no thanks..... the NIMBY response just kicked in...
    In all fairness, shouldn't they encamp in Central Park? And if there is overflow, I understand Chicago is a 'gun free zone', they'll be safe there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the denizens of Central Park and Chicago would say that was a racist plot to bring down property values there.

      It does sound like a good solution to me, though.

      Delete
  9. Ah, Harry...we don't want them in my backyard. I feel safer with a volcano. My odds look better. --Troy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, there's always the grand canyon I guess. Ought to just about hold them all if Barrack Hussein has his way on importing "refugees" by the hundreds of thousands.

      Delete
    2. harry,
      great idea!
      build a dam at the bottom end and loose all the water from the top end! shouldn't take long to solve much of the problem.

      Delete
    3. Given Barrack's desired head count, there won't be any room left in the canyon for water once he's met his quota.

      Delete
  10. We looked at Cody, Greybull, and the Powell area back in 2011. We could almost watch the property values increase from month to month. It's hard to find anything for sale there that's reasonable. A mobile home on a lot...$100k. Forget acreage with a home unless you have hundreds of thousands. Plus, the area is arid. NW Wyoming does not get much rain or snow. Any gardening will require sources other than precipitation. Still, if I had the money, I would move in a hearbeat. If Yellowstone blows, we're all dead anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No problem. BLM can just seize the land for the "refugees" like it does any other property it wants. If anybody objects they can just send them to prison.

      On the level, I like the area but I don't want to be anywhere near that volcano. I have enough to deal with here in the Blue Ridge. ;-)

      Delete
    2. Don't forget the wind!

      There's an old joke that goes "What do they use for a windsock in Wyoming?

      A logging chain!".

      Delete
    3. I like wind but that's a bit excessive even for me. I saw an example of the Wyoming wind on that show "Dead End Delivery", pretty rough!

      Delete