Truth.

A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.

Ariel Durant

Thursday, May 25, 2017

A very partial list of reasons we should not allow Moslem immigration into our country.


*****************************

London, England Terror Attack: July 7, 2005



52 Killed

52 Killed, 724 wounded




Mohammad Sidique Khan

******************************

Nice, France Terror Attack: 14 July 2016



 86 Killed.
434 Injured.


Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel

******************************

Fort Hood Texas Terror Attack: 5 Nov 2009


13 Killed

13 killed, 32 wounded


Nadal Malik Hassan

******************************

Manchester Terror Attack: 24 May 2017




22 Killed

22 Killed,  62 wounded, 4 missing



Salman Ramadan Abedi


******************************

Paris Terror Attack, 13 Nov 2015



 130 killed.

130 Killed, 368 Wounded



Abdel Hamid Abaaoud

******************************

Orlando Terror Attack: June 12 2016



49 Killed

49 Killed, 53 wounded.



Omar Mateen

******************************

San Bernardeno Terror Attack: Dec 2, 2015



14 Killed

14 killed, 22 wounded.



Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik,

******************************

Chattanooga Terror Attack: July 15, 2015




5 Killed

5 killed , two wounded


Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez

******************************

Beirut Terror Attack: 23 October 1983





241 killed
220 Marines, 18 Sailors, 3 Soldiers

241 killed, 128 wounded




Sayyid Ruhollah Mūsavi Khomeini

I could go on,  but you get my point.  Importing Moslems into the United States is nothing less than suicidal.  It doesn't matter whether an immigrant kills you, or their kids do. You are just as dead. 






The God's Truth:


The night of the Manchester Bombing, I watched some of the late night news shows. More coverage was given to the accusation that President Trump asked two Intelligence Department Heads to tell the truth about the Russian interference scam than was given to the attack. The Talking Heads of MSM treated the terror attack as a side show.






40 comments:

  1. And that goes for all the so called peaceful or moderate Muslims, too. Ever notice that none of theme ever condemn what their brethren did? Do they speak out against the evil acts? No, sir! (spit)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't do us one iota of good to let a Moslem family come here, if they are going to raise kids who launch terror attacks in this country. I'd rather they pay the penalty for being part of a violent religion, by not being admitted here. The alternative appears to be that we pay the penalty, in terms of body count, for letting them in.

      After the Manchester bombing, the media here went into overdrive trying to paper the truth over. I watched CBS and ABC news that night. Neither network condemned the attacks. But what they did do was dredge up "good Moslems" for their broadcast. CBS used a Moslem taxi driver who had given some of the kids from the arena a ride home for free. He is a "Moslem Hero." But the guy did not condemn the bombing, nor the bomber. He just said he felt sorry for all the teenagers wandering around outside the arena in a state of shock.

      ABC found a couple of Moslem women in their Burka rig, out in the street the next day. They said they felt sorry for the mothers who had lost children, but not a word did they say about the bomber, about the attack. Nothing.

      Delete
    2. Islam means Submission. It is their goal to subdue the peoples of the world to becoming Muslim....those who do not will die;it is their ultimate goal, and the stupid liberals are too dumb to see it. Truly, their eyes have been blinded by Evil. I see where President Trump's travel ban has once again been knocked down by the liberal court. Personally, I think he should just ignore them; the precedent has been set by Abe Lincoln and Roosevelt. Ignore them, I say...Prez has total power over immigration.

      Delete
    3. My hope is that one of the terrorists will "go off" in San Francisco, where the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is located. They need to see for themselves what their stupidity has unleashed on the U.S.

      I agree with you about just ignoring them. It's clear he does have the power to limit immigration, plenty of Presidents have done it before, and it's no secret the 9th Circuit is full of left wing idiots. I'm not sure what mechanism would work to go around them though, since the shadow government is full of moonbats and they would undoubtedly be very pious and offended, and refuse to obey orders.

      Delete
    4. Harry, that 'muslim' taxidriver is a Sihk. Last name of Singh. Good turban person/religion.

      Funny that Sihks started out as a pacifistic religion and only became some severely bad mofos due to... muslims.

      That taxi driver is doing what the tenets of his religion ask (not demand) of him.

      I have nothing but respect for the Sihks.

      Now, as to the muslims, well, I will be polite and not go into my typical rant.

      Delete
    5. They will obey orders or go to jail. Once Prez Trump makes up his mind heads will roll.

      Delete
    6. Hey, I'll be glad to volunteer to drive the back hoe and haul the quick lime. There are an awful lot of people in this country that will only be "cured" by the Pol Pot regimen.

      Delete
    7. Andrew, he didn't have his little turbin on his head with the golden dagger concealed in it. So that means that particular network couldn't dredge up even one "good" Moslem to trot out on the show. Maybe they could have borrowed the footage of the two "burka babes."

      Delete
    8. I think the charity of muslims was truly shown during the car attack a while back. A whole panoply of people were helping the victims, but the girl in a head-bag was just walking by, texting on her phone. Says it all.

      Delete
    9. Moslems are not renowned for their kind deeds. Saladin was the last one of those I know of who had a reputation for kindness.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous
    12:08 PM (52 minutes ago)

    to me
    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "A very partial list of reasons we should not allow...":

    Read just your post concerning trolls , the so named cloe is a guy of Great Britain , young and studyIng in a social media sector. Suppose he just wants to provoke. I know his cousin , who is a serious person. I do not agree about all you write in your blog , but globally it's ok.
    Jonathan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jonathan, when I got your comment, I deleted it. To be honest, it came in within a few minutes of a particularly scurrilous little screed from "Chloe" and I suspected that you were her. I can't check on an anonymous post. "Chloe", when he/she/it tries to worm onto a blog, starts out the new "character/persona" very modestly. Then, he/she/it starts slowing ramping up, trying to stir up trouble. Once he/she/it is "unmasked" then it goes to full bore obscenity and insults. So for all I know, you are a new "Chloe" shill.

      But then, thinking about it, I realized you may be legitimate. So you are welcome here until you're not.

      Delete
  3. Time after time the religion of peace terrorists kill and wound the innocent.
    Time after time the citizens leave flowers, teddy bears and candles at makeshift memorials.
    Time after time Facebook posts and Tweets express sympathy and assure those victims that thoughts and prayers are with them.
    And time after time the majority of citizens sit back and wait for the next bomb to go off because this is, after all, the new normal.
    Those politicians and judges who stop the immigration ban and who oppose securing our borders are just as guilty as those who detonate the bombs.
    Those local politicians who maintain sanctuary cities and who harbor those illegals who would do us harm are just as guilty as those who shoot and slash innocents in the name of allah.
    Those in muslim neighborhoods who know what the terrorists among them are doing and say nothing are just as guilty as the terrorists.

    But none are held accountable. And if we speak out we are guilty of racism, islamophobia and bigotry and hate speech.
    It is a sick world we live in, Harry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right in all you say. I'm really disgusted with the "Islamic merry-go-round" routine. Until they have to pay a price for their acts, they won't stop. In Israel, terrorists have their houses blown up. I'd say that's mild compared to the actions we need to take.

      Delete
    2. The reason that 'time after time' occurs is due to the complete impossible task of realizing that the religion of Islam want all non-muslims either dead or enslaved or taxed into submission, with dead being the preferred state.

      People just can't accept that fact. There is no peace. There is only submission or death.

      And no amounts of teddy bears will help, unless they are painted on the outside of some free-fall ordinance...

      Delete
    3. I still can't understand why no one who lost a family member has done anything more proactive than put a teddy bear by a candle. If somebody killed my kids, somebody would pay. Might not be the exact people who did the deed, but it would impact on those that supported him. There's an old saying in the military that some might feel applies in this situation. "Kill them all, let God sort them out later."

      Delete
    4. Harry, it's England. It is against the Law to say anything negative against the goat-humpers. The Law Enforcement branches are already going after the few, brave people who have stood up. They have taken down sites, deleted messages, and threatened prosecution.

      England is most likely lost forever, just a haunted memory of greatness as it slips below the waves of time.

      Delete
    5. And, yeah, that "Kill them all, God will know his own" line comes from the Albigensian Crusade.

      Maybe a new crusade will help England. Probably the only thing that can.

      Delete
    6. Yeah, I could never understand parents who
      s children have been harmed decrying the lenient sentences handed out. I'd want the guy out on the streets, preferably accompanied by a few homeys (parents would do).
      My nephew, the detective, calls that a target rich environment.

      Delete
    7. Andrew, I didn't know the expression went back so far. I know it was used in Vietnam, reflecting the troop's frustration with "rice paddy farmer today, put on your black jammies at night and become VC" situations.

      We used in Beirut, where today, militia X, Y, and Z were our "friends", but A, B, C were our "enemies." The next day, everybody reversed roles. It was pretty clear to us that they were all Islamist extremist outfits, although the term hadn't been invented yet. The feeling was that we could not discriminate between them because there was no difference between them.

      Delete
  4. What more proof do you need than this post?

    The moderate Muslims won't express condemnation since I'm sure they're afraid for their own lives. Stockholm syndrome maybe?

    What left me scratching my head this week was Trump's visit to the Saudis; you know, the guys that flew into the towers? I guess we can sell them plenty of new weaponry and hope to God they don't turn our guns on us. But as they say, the enemy of my enemy (Iran) is my friend. --Troy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have always suspected that "moderate" Moslems secretly approve of the terrorists, and don't really condemn them for their acts. I know in France, tacit approval for terror attacks is very high in the "no go" zones.

      "The Guerrilla must move amongst the people as a fish swims in the sea." Mao

      The Saudi's hate the Iranians. But the Saudis subsidize the Wahhabi sect. All over the world, the Wahhabi's run schools where the sole curriculum consists of memorizing the Koran, and learning to hate the West, Christians, and non-Wahhabi Moslems.

      Saudi Arabia's royal family is rife with members that donate to Wahhabi factions. The most notable donors, for reasons I don't understand, are Saudi princesses.

      The Saudi's have supplied weapons to militias that turned out to Al Qaeda fronts. The Saudi explanation is the Al Qaeda (Sunni) is fighting Hezbollah (Shiite) in Syria. Of course, they both hate the West and especially us, so this is not a good deal for America.

      I, personally, would trust a Saudi as far as I could throw him. Two of them once nearly killed me in Athens, Greece. I was staying at the Saint John's hotel there, and two Saudis got on the elevator with me. They were so drenched in perfume I thought I was going to throw up, or be asphyxiated, before I could get off the elevator. It was a near thing.... It was a small elevator, and these two guys were "pinky locked", as they like to be. There was no place to flee.

      Delete
    2. there have been polls here in the u.s. indicating a vast majority of muslims here think it is okay to kill us. the best islam scholar told bob sefert after 9-11 "we can either convert or kill them all, there are no in between measures for peace." if they are to be "good" muslims they must follow the koran and jihad. that means kill us infidels wherever they find us. i'm not converting.

      Delete
    3. That's pretty much the party line with Islam. Most of the people here who want to "hug it out" with them, have never been in an Islamic country nor been around Moslems. They don't know what they're talking about.

      Delete
  5. I just can't understand why any one person would want a group of people dead. I could never do that. No matter how much I didn't see eye to eye with them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the best thing to do is accept that the Moslems are the way they are. If the particular couple you know and like are good people, there's no certainty that their kids won't be blowing up your kids in a few years. So, my premise, is just don't have them here, and that eliminates the possibility that they or their progeny will kill a couple of hundred people at the wall or at the school, or the church...

      Delete
  6. Well, I think we , as Americans, are going to have to start by cleaning our own house. The elected offal, er, officials, the appointed for life un American "Judges" who cram this down our throats are going to have to be removed from office. Impeached, recalled, whatever it takes. Next come the so called religious "charities" who make millions by "resettling" these unwanted additions. And until all of the above happens, every attack that happens here needs to be pinned on the serial killers that run things here. Enough is enough, we are NOT ruled here. Time to stop acting like it. And yeah, blow up my kid, watch what happens next.In fact, if they had a spine in England they would find his Mosque, find the Imam that teaches that crap, execute him in the street out front, and then blow up the mosque. If they did that a time or two, I bet the Imams would be a lot more circumspect about what they taught. EEEENOUGH!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's strange, isn't it, that no father has gone down to the mosque and engaged in some payback. Even in England, where the citizens have been disarmed, you'd think somebody would walk in with a golf club and lay about him.

      We do need to clean our judiciary system out, but federal judges are appointed for life, so that poses a problem. There are solutions, but it will take some stalwart individuals with some money to start weeding these slugs out through the system. Some people may choose to work outside the system.

      What's particularly amazing is that even after all these horrific events, there are plenty of apologists for the Moslem religion in the West. They are a kind of mental Amish. Do anything you want to me and I'll find excuses for it.

      I don't understand these people but I know they are out there. A lot of them are in political office, in business, in education, and in the media.

      Delete
  7. Hey Harry,

    (captaincrunch)

    I noticed the some of the comments said something about 'trolling' One trick of trolling is to use different 'syntax'
    People can tell who you are by the use of 'syntax' in writing.

    I had an idea for a 'Crusader' ICBM that has a record 12 merves (multiple reentry vehicles)

    There are sure a lot of screwball immigrants out there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Chloe" tries to change his/her/it's use of grammar, slang, and tone when he/she/it is creating a new character. That's why I think "Jonathan" may be a Chloe creation. But I was uncertain enough that I went into my discard folder and reconstituted his comment. If Chloe can get me to not publish other people's comments, then she's partially successful in disrupting my blog.

      We used to have a fighter called the Crusader, the F-8 . The British had a tank in WW2 called the Crusader. I think they should renamed the Mother of All Bombs to the Mecca Bomb.

      Yes, there are a lot of problems manifesting themselves as "refugees" and "immigrants." President Trump is going to the Supreme Court over this right now.

      Delete
  8. How about that Montana guy winning! Too bad he turned wimpy and apologized to that scumbag reporter; he had me until then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rush talked about that on the first part of his show today. I hadn't heard about it as I have cut back so much on my television watching since I got Amazon Prime.

      I'm glad he kicked that guy's ass. Probably his advisors made him offer the apology so they could get the issue in the past. At least his actions speak louder than his words.

      Delete
  9. The reporter should be the one apologizing as he was out of line, rude and in-your-face. He got what he deserved. If this guy backed down so easily, what's he going to do against the Congress critters? I get all my news online, mostly from conservative news sites. I check out RT and Fox, too, just to see their slant on things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I heard his apology on the news, and it wasn't very all encompassing. He basically said he knew some people were embarrassed by the incident and he would not repeat it. Seemed like an ok guy, overall. And he did bust that guy's chops.

      Delete
  10. He also said he made a mistake. No, he didn't. He caved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, at least he won and holds the seat, which hurts the Dimmies.

      Delete
  11. Hey Harry,

    (captaincrunch)


    I always read the quotes you put at the top of the blog. Your latest is by Arlen Spector, former Senator from Pennsylvania who was in the senate for decades. He was the 'Nancy Pelosi' of Pennsylvania and during the 'first tea party uprising' years ago. One brave man after the first Obamacare vote asked 'Arlen Spector' to quote 'Why cant you just leave us alone' heres the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32jzb8izZTE
    Here's the best video of the Arlen Specter video's. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgpSoiiWNww

    I like your quotes, especially by Robert E. Lee and a few others, but I had to point out that 'Arlen Specter' is not worthy to be quoted on this great blog:)

    Arlen Specter (now deceased thankfully) is from the same 'cancerous, traitorous ilk' as Nancy Pelosi, Diane Fienstien and a great many others that have sold out to the neo-socialist interest's of corporation ruled America.

    I do have one good quote memorized from 'one very honorable' individual. Sir Winston Churchill said that 'Islam is as dangerous to the mind of a man as Rabies is to a dog'
    Heres the link http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/winston-churchills-brutal-takedown-of-islam-means-more-today-than-ever

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CC, Arlen Specter was an interesting individual. He was a Korean War Air Force veteran. He started out his political career as a Democrat, later switched over to the Republican Party, and then switched back to the Democrats.

      In most matters, Specter was considered a "centrist."

      On "social" issues he was a rabid "progressive" and he was an ardent supporter of Slick Willie. But on things like the government illegally wire tapping U.S. citizens, he was on the right side of the question.

      Actually, CC, when I use a quote it's to make a point on an issue. In this case, even a "progressive" like Specter was willing to call a spade and spade, and point out terrorism was a dire threat to us. But today, Democrats wont' do that. Instead they suck up to Islam and they don't care a damn about the people of his country. They only care about their own agenda.

      I have that quote from Churchill on the blog here somewhere. What he actually said was a bit different, but the "English" has been changed to "American" since most people here wouldn't know what "hydrophobia" was but they all know rabies.

      Delete
    2. Hey Harry,

      (captaincrunch)


      I understand your logic on the Arlen Spector quote. 'At least give me credit for 'catching the Arlen Specter' quote and questioning your logic behind using that quote.
      There's not enough 'question of authority and teachers' in our society anymore.

      Delete
    3. CC: I would have sworn I already responded to this, but if I did it didn't post. No problem, I am not a big Arlen Spector fan, just wanted to point out that even he could see the need to take steps against terrorism, which his ilk can't see today.

      Delete